Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
General Dynamics F-16XL by bagera3005 General Dynamics F-16XL by bagera3005
General Dynamics F-16XL Fighting Falcon
Last revised October 3, 2003

In February of 1980, General Dynamics made a proposal for a Fighting Falcon version with a radically-modified wing shape. The project was known as SCAMP (Supersonic Cruise and Maneuvering Prototype) and later as F-16XL. The wing was to be of a cranked-arrow wing shape, with double the area of the standard F-16 wing. This new wing would, it was hoped, make supersonic cruise performance possible.

This program was initially funded by the manufacturer, and involved conversion of two FSD F-16As. In late 1980, the USAF and General Dynamics agreed to a cooperative test program, with the Air Force providing the third and sixth FSD F-16s for modification into F-16XL prototypes. The fuselage was lengthened to 54 feet 1.86 inches, and was fitted with a cranked-arrow wing incorporated carbon composite materials to save weight. The increased area allowed the incorporation of up to 17 stores stations.

Although the rebuild did involve a modest increase in the length of the fuselage, the new XL designation did NOT stand for "Xtra Length". The origin of the name XL seems to have been with Harry Hillaker himself. Harry Hillaker was an avid golfer, and one day he and a friend were on the golf course and were discussing what they should call the new SCAMP project. Harry wanted a name that would reflect the new design's ability to fly longer and farther than the original F-16. He happened to look down and noticed that the golf ball he was using was a Top Flite XL. He chose this as the name of the SCAMP design.

The first of two F-16XLs (75-0749) had a single seat and was powered by an F100-PW-201 turbofan. It flew for the first time on July 3, 1982, with James McKinney at the controls. The second F-16XL was originally the third FSD F-16A (75-0747) which had been damaged in a landing accident. It was fitted with an F-16B two-seat cockpit. It was powered by a 29,000 lb.s.t. General Electric F110-GE-100 turbofan. It flew for the first time on October 29, 1982, piloted by Alex Wolf and Jim McKinney. The single-seater is sometimes known as the F-16XL-1, the two-seater as F-16XL-2

The ventral fins of the standard F-16 were not fitted. The absence of ventral fins and the canting of the aft fuselage three degrees allows greater angles of attack on landing, which decreases the approach speed. Split airbrakes were fited to either side of the rear jetpipe exhaust, and a drag chute assembly similar to that fitted to the Norwegian, Belgian, and Venezuelan F-16s was fitted underneath the vertical fin trailing edge. The drag chute assembly was initially fitted only to the two-seat F-16XL, but was later retrofitted to the single-seat F-16XL during NASA service.

The centerline and two inlet stations are common to the F-16C/D. Four AIM-120 AMRAAM stations are partially submerged in the wing roots. Four hardpoints with twn stations are underneath each inboard wing panel, and AIM-9/AIM-120 missile launch rails can be carried at each wingtip.

The handling of the F-16XL was reportedly quite different from that of the standard F-16, offering a much smoother ride at high speeds at low altitudes.

In March of 1981, the USAF announced that it would be developing a new advanced tactical fighter to replace the F-111 in the low-level, night, and bad-weather interdiction role. Since the F-16XL was already on hand, General Dynamics entered the F-16XL in the competition, the McDonnell Douglas company submitting an adaptation of the two-seat F-15B Eagle. In February of 1984, the Air Force announced that it had selected the McDonnell Douglas design in preference to proposed production versions of F-16XL. The McDonnell Douglas proposal was later to enter production as the F-15E Strike Eagle.

Had the F-16XL won the competition, production aircraft would have been designated F-16E (single-seat) and F-16F (two-seat). Following the loss of the contract to McDonnell Douglas, General Dynamics returned both F-16XLs to Fort Worth during the summer of 1985 and placed them in storage. They had made 437 and 361 flights respectively. Although supersonic cruise without afterburner had been an original goal of the F-16XL program, the aircraft never did quite achieve this feat.

In late 1988, the two prototypes were taken out of storage and turned over to NASA. They were used in a program designed to evaluate aerodynamics concepts to improve wing airflow during sustained supersonic flight.

The first F-16XL was reflown on March 9, 1989 and delivered to the Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility at Edwards AFB. This aircraft was modified for laminar-flow studies with an experimental titanium section on its left wing with active suction to siphon off a portion of a layer of turbulent surface air via millions of tiny laser-cut holes. The first flight with the new wing took place on May 3, 1990, pilot Steve Ishmael at the controls. This aircraft has been assigned the NASA number of 849.

The single-seat F16XL was briefly assigned to the NASA/Langley facility in Virginia from April to November 1994 to evaluate takeoff performance and engine noise as part of a project to evaluate the configuration of a possible future high-speed civil transport.

The second F-16XL (75-0747) went to NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards AFB. The aircraft has carried the NASA number 846 (briefly) and 848. The two-seater has continued with the laminar-flow studies initiated by the single-seater.

Specification of F-16XL:

Engine: One Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-200 turbofan, 23,770 pounds with afterburning. Maximum speed: Mach 2.05 at 40,000 feet. Dimensions: wingspan 34 feet 3 inches, length 54 feet 2 inches, height 17 feet 7 inches, wing area 646 square feet. Weights: 43,000 pounds combat, 48,000 pounds maximum takeoff. Armament: 0ne 20-mm M61A1 cannon. An AIM-9 Sidewinder infrared-homing air-to-air missile could be carried at each wingtip. An external ordnance load of up to 15,000 pounds could be carried on up to 17 external hardpoints.
Add a Comment:
harshbhavsar22 Featured By Owner Mar 28, 2015
Do you have any idea that which Airfoil is used in F-16xl's wing root and tip? Is it same of F-16 fighting falcon (NACA 64A204) or different? If anyone knows please tell me. I need it for modelling F-16xl. 
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Mar 28, 2015  Professional Interface Designer
pete8680 Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2013
If G.D. went with a name like F-19 (which was never offically assigned) or F-22 (Raptor not desinged yet and F20 assinged to Tigershark F-21 assinged to Kfir) the USAF may of picked it cause we all kno the Brass likes the newest toys! Good work as always.
SixthCircle Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2012  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Cranked arrow! >.<
jsf-35 Featured By Owner Jan 10, 2011
jsf-35 Featured By Owner Jan 10, 2011
atlas1959 Featured By Owner Jul 10, 2010
Too bad this Viper variant had to lose out to the Mudhen...oh well.
TomCatDriver Featured By Owner May 7, 2010
too bad it was cancelled...! i,m sure an export version would have sold like hotcakes.
sommer98 Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2008
I wish they had put it into production it was ahead of its time.
Streaked-Silver Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2008  Hobbyist Digital Artist
meh... looks lame compared to the original i think, :/ course i rarely like the MIG wing look
Roguewing Featured By Owner Sep 14, 2008  Hobbyist General Artist
Man, you did it again.
You found another of my favorite concepts.

Would have been sweet to see it fly.
awash2002 Featured By Owner Sep 14, 2008
Nice aircraft bud
Add a Comment:
  • Photo
Download PNG 1194 × 1627


Submitted on
September 14, 2008
Image Size
107 KB


11,029 (6 today)
76 (who?)
1,450 (1 today)


Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.