Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
  • Photo
  • Art Gifts
Download PNG 1025 × 1865


Submitted on
October 8, 2009
Image Size
106 KB


7,566 (7 today)
76 (who?)


Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Henschel Hs P 75 Heavy Fighter by bagera3005 Henschel Hs P 75 Heavy Fighter by bagera3005
Henschel Hs P 75 Heavy Fighter

This 1941 aircraft design was to be a possible successor to the Messerschmitt Bf 110 heavy fighter. Although of a unusual configuration for that time, there were advantages (and disadvantages) to its rear wing/forward canard construction.
The Hs P.75 featured a tapered fuselage, with the slightly swept-back wings being mounted mid-fuselage and set back to the rear of the aircraft. The widened fuselage was designed to house the Daimler Benz DB 610 engine, which were two DB 605 engines joined side-by-side, just aft of the cockpit. These were the same engines that the Heinkel He 177 used, and were found to be prone to overheating and catching fire.Due to this development, they were changed in 1942 to the liquid-cooled, 24 cylinder Daimler Benz DB 613 engines (two coupled DB 603s) that produced 3500 horsepower. Both engine configurations were to drive contrarotating propellers (to offset tourque) of a 3.2m (10' 6") diameter via an extension shaft. There were a pair of swept-back canards located on the nose of the aircraft, that were to serve the purpose of elevators. The vertical tail unit was mounted beneath the fuselage, so that it could act as a tail bumper upon takeoff so that the propellers would not strike the ground. Since the propellers were located at the rear in a pusher configuration, a tricycle landing gear arrangement was chosen. Fuel was contained in three tanks, one in each wing and one behind the cockpit. A single pilot sat in the cockpit which was located about midway along the fuselage, and four Mk 108 30mm cannons were mounted in the nose.
The advantages of the pusher propeller/forward canard design was that it opened up the pilot's view, plus the weapons installation was much simplified and could be concentrated. The disadvantages would be engine cooling plus an ejecction system or propeller jettison would have to be designed for the pilot to safely exit the plane in case of an emergency.
This basic design was realized in several WWII aircraft designs, notably the Kyushu J7W1 Shinden and Curtiss XP-55 Ascender . Although good results were obtained with a model in the windtunnel, this design was not followed up.

Height 4.3 m 14' 1
Length 12.2 m 40' 0"
Span 11.3 m 37' 1"
Wing Area 28.4 m² 305.7 ft²
Max Weight 28.4 m² 305.7 ft
Wing Loading 264 kg/m² 54 lbs/ft²
Ceiling 12000 m 39370'
Max. Speed 790 km/h 491 mph
Add a Comment:
Kenisi Featured By Owner May 1, 2013
Looks just like a Bloodhawk from Crimosn Skies ^ ^
bagera3005 Featured By Owner May 1, 2013  Professional Interface Designer
got it back words
Kenisi Featured By Owner May 1, 2013
Yeah, I know, the devs probably got the inspiration for the Bloodhawk from the P 75, obviously it wasn´t the other way around, if that´s what you´re pointing out.
blueace1986 Featured By Owner Feb 25, 2013
This is so cool to see. To bad it was never built.
Anzac-A1 Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2014
Probably good that it wasn't. Otherwise, the war could've been much worse.
blueace1986 Featured By Owner Nov 18, 2014
Quite true
ONI-Defense Featured By Owner Apr 13, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Gotta love Nazi engineering.
Gorthank Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2009
YAY! Thankies for making this print! :D
artstain Featured By Owner Oct 9, 2009  Professional Traditional Artist
Wow! absolutely looked wicked and if a ride on TomCat i want to knock down that Nazi'z mother plane :D
Malil Featured By Owner Oct 9, 2009
how will it land with the fin sticking down like that? lol
Add a Comment: