| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
#AircraftFanClub
#Airplane-lovers
#Aeroheads
#MilitaryAddicts
#Military-dedication
#WarAircraft4Life
#ModelSheetCentral
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `ChewedKandi has certainly gone out of her way to keep the vector community on the right path. Always making sure that her talents are infinitely scalable, Sharon has put her bezier curves to excellent use, and firmly anchored herself as an inspirational leader. We're absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for June 2013 to `ChewedKandi. Congratulations, Sharon! Read More
|
Sta.sh
It CoUlD go Mach 3, but only on a one way trip, after which it needed new engines. It was HUGE for a fighter, but trying to dogfight at Mach 3 let alone Mach 1, isn't really an option(given most Bullets fly about as fast as Mach 3 you'd almost have your own bullets flying back at you, or in fact you'd be flying into your own bullets). Gun-fighting is best done at below the speed of sound, where Missiles can be at times 50/50 or worse but a good (close)six o'clock position with a cannon is almost always a kill if done right. So the B-1 would B a Sitting goose trying to dogfight (w/a gun) anything other than maybe a Sopwith Camel biplane.
So the Air to Air missiles would the second best bet, next to say the F-22/F-35 squadron(s) backing up the B-1R(s).
Bombers are primarily made to be stable so their bombs/missiles have a stable platform to drop/fire from. Fighters on the other hand are made to be purposely unstable so they can maneuver quickly in a 'snap'. The size of the B-1 is quite a lot bigger than any fighter, so too goes its mass. I'd doubt it can snap turn as fast as a fighter or fast enough to be effective 'alone'.
There's a reason that all bombers now have no guns equipped on them for defense, Fighters are too fast to track. The last bomber that had defensive guns I believe was the venerable B-52, though those were only in the tail pointed behind the bomber, those have since been removed. The last 'Fully' gun equipped bomber was the B-29(circa 1945) which had remote operation of its turrets allowing on person to bring four or more turrets to bear on a incoming enemy fighter/interceptor. I've seen some WWII bombers have a sort of forward facing offensive guns mostly B-24 Liberators.
All modern bombers have to use either passive(aka Stealth(B-2)) or active(B-52 and above) ECM or Electronic Countermeasures to jam RADAR(be it either Missile or detection) to prevent or delay interceptors from getting to them. The original B-1a was designed to be a quick Mach 2 sprinter in and out of target area, the B-1b is redesigned to be more stealthy(redesigned engine intakes) and a low level Nap-of-the-earth (abbreviated NOE) style navigating where the bomber fly's below enemy radar at VERY low level, it still can reach Mach speeds. Ironically the concept that became the B-1 was studied since the 1950's!