Shop More Submit  Join Login
×
  • Photo
Download PNG 1416 × 960




Details

Submitted on
August 15, 2012
Image Size
45.9 KB
Resolution
1416×960
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,631
Favourites
63 (who?)
Comments
18
Downloads
98

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
×
Rods of gods by bagera3005 Rods of gods by bagera3005
Kinetic bombardment

A kinetic bombardment is the act of attacking a planetary surface with an inert projectile, where the destructive force comes from the kinetic energy of the projectile impacting at very high velocities. The concept is encountered in science fiction and is thought to have originated during the Cold War.

Non-orbital bombardments with kinetic projectiles, such as lobbing stones with siege engines such as catapults or trebuchets are considered siege warfare, not kinetic bombardment.

Project Thor

Project Thor is an idea for a weapons system that launches kinetic projectiles from Earth orbit to damage targets on the ground. Jerry Pournelle originated the concept while working in operations research at Boeing in the 1950s before becoming a science-fiction writer.[1][2]

The most described system is "an orbiting tungsten telephone pole with small fins and a computer in the back for guidance". The weapon can be down-scaled, an orbiting "crowbar" rather than a pole.[citation needed] The system described in the 2003 United States Air Force (USAF) report was that of 20-foot-long (6.1 m), 1-foot-diameter (0.30 m) tungsten rods, that are satellite controlled, and have global strike capability, with impact speeds of Mach 10.[3][4][5]

The time between deorbiting and impact would only be a few minutes, and depending on the orbits and positions in the orbits, the system would have a world-wide range.[citation needed] There is no requirement to deploy missiles, aircraft or other vehicles. Although the SALT II (1979) prohibited the deployment of orbital weapons of mass destruction, it did not prohibit the deployment of conventional weapons. The system is not prohibited by either the Outer Space Treaty nor the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.[4][6]

The idea is that the weapon would inflict damage because it moves at orbital velocities, at least 9 kilometers per second. Smaller weapons can deliver measured amounts of energy as small as a 225 kg conventional bomb.[citation needed] Some systems are quoted as having the yield of a small tactical nuclear bomb.[5] These designs are envisioned as a bunker buster.[4][7]

In the case of the system mentioned in the 2003 USAF report above, a 6.1m x 0.3m tungsten cylinder impacting at Mach 10 has a kinetic energy equivalent to approximately 11.5 tons of TNT (or 7.2 tons of dynamite). The mass of such a cylinder is itself over 8 tons, so it is clear that the practical applications of such a system are limited to those situations where its other characteristics provide a decisive advantage - a conventional bomb/warhead of similar weight to the tungsten rod, delivered by conventional means, provides similar destructive capability and is a far more practical method.

The highly elongated shape and high density are to enhance sectional density and therefore minimize kinetic energy loss due to air friction and maximize penetration of hard or buried targets. The larger device is expected to be quite good at penetrating deeply buried bunkers and other command and control targets.[8] The smaller "crowbar" size might be employed for anti-armor, anti-aircraft, anti-satellite and possibly anti-personnel use.

The weapon would be very hard to defend against. It has a very high closing velocity and a small radar cross-section. Launch is difficult to detect. Any infra-red launch signature occurs in orbit, at no fixed position. The infra-red launch signature also has a small magnitude compared to a ballistic missile launch. One drawback of the system is that the weapon's sensors would almost certainly be blind during atmospheric reentry due to the plasma sheath that would develop ahead of it, so a mobile target could be difficult to hit if it performed any unexpected maneuvering. The system would also have to cope with atmospheric heating from re-entry, which could melt the weapon.[9]

While the larger version might be individually launched, the smaller versions would be launched from "pods" or "carriers" that contained several missiles
Add a Comment:
 
:iconsonicfighter:
sonicfighter Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2014
Building weapons like this is a violation to the Outer Space Treaty.
Reply
:iconjohnnyotgs:
JohnnyOTGS Featured By Owner May 21, 2014
This orbiting superweapon was used in Tom Clancy's EndWar. It was code named "Freedom Star".
Reply
:iconarenafighter:
arenafighter Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012
Wild! Think What Could Happen if Terrorists Got their Hands on these though!
Reply
:iconchibisuke-hikaru:
chibisuke-hikaru Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012
not in the mood to read all description

.

is this a satelite??
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012  Professional Interface Designer
YES
Reply
:iconpassin:
Passin Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012
Lethal, if perhaps a little impractical to reload
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012  Professional Interface Designer
you just lunch a new little one an keep the eye in sky up
Reply
:icontemplar127:
templar127 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012
NICE! Are the rods inside the satellite? and what are the rods made of?
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012  Professional Interface Designer
one sat lights for aiming other is lunched sprightly an is fired
Reply
:icontemplar127:
templar127 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2012
DO they have to be together to fire the weapon?
Reply
Add a Comment: