Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
USS United States CVX-80 by bagera3005 USS United States CVX-80 by bagera3005
USS United States CVX-80

Statistical Data:
Length: 980 feet (298.7 meters)
Draft: 37 feet (11.3 meters)
Width: 280 feet (85.3 meters)
Displacement: 65,200 tons standard and 82,500 tons fully loaded
Cargo: 6,200 tons of nonessential equipment and supplies. Each enlisted crew member has a small locker for personal items and uniforms. Ships officers have more space for personal items. Most of the ships spaces are taken up by extra ammo, armor, troops, weapons, and engines.
Power System: 4 Fusion Reactors, average life span is 20 years
Market Cost: Not for Sale but costs around 1.65 billion credits to construct. If found and sold on the black market would probably cost 5 to 8 billion credits.

Speed:
Surface: 46 mph (40 knots/ 74.1 kph)
Range: Unlimited due to fusion engines (needs to refuel every 20 years and requires maintenance as well). Ship carries six months of supplies on board.

redesign
Add a Comment:
 
:icon1945gunner:
1945gunner Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
If this was only side view I wold have thought it was the zumwalt class ships XD 
Reply
:iconfractal-image:
Fractal-Image Featured By Owner May 20, 2014
Stealth Carrier? Nice. Some Zumwalt and Nimitz put together. Me Likey.
Reply
:iconfujin777:
Fujin777 Featured By Owner Mar 18, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Badass carrier baby!
Reply
:iconjax1776:
Jax1776 Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Looks awesome..
Reply
:iconblue-jedi:
Blue-Jedi Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2013
That's pretty cool.  It looks like you have an F-14Z hanging off the starboard forward catapult :)
Reply
:icon678091:
678091 Featured By Owner Dec 14, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
The fusion engines are not a propultion drive it is a power sourece so better fix that on your own
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Dec 14, 2012  Professional Interface Designer
i will
Reply
:icon678091:
678091 Featured By Owner Dec 14, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
ok just helping
Reply
:iconmikechuy:
mikechuy Featured By Owner Jun 4, 2011   Traditional Artist
Isn't the F-24 used here a concept from the A/F-X program?
Reply
:iconmagnumthehedgehog:
MagnumtheHedgehog Featured By Owner Sep 25, 2010
This would be the United States 2, considering the fact the name was used for an aircraft carrier that had no island fo more deck space, its keel and some lower parts of the hull were built, but technically that would make this the USS. United States II
Reply
:iconlongjcl:
longjcl Featured By Owner May 27, 2011
No - it would still be just the "United States". CVN-65, USS Enterprise is not called "Enterprise VIII", CV-62, USS Independence was not called "Independence V". When a ship is decommissioned or stricken, its name is also stricken.
Reply
:iconshiiva-katase:
Shiiva-Katase Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2009
I like the design, but the name USS United States doesn't make any sense. USS is an acronym for United States Ship. So, you've named your ship (in full) "The United States Ship, United States." Like I said, the design is awesome, but the name makes no sense (unless the United States part of the title isn't supposed to be the name).
Reply
:icononi-defense:
ONI-Defense Featured By Owner Jan 21, 2011  Student Digital Artist
There actually was a canceled aircraft carrier called the United States.
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2009  Professional Interface Designer
it was play on uss name to see if fanboys would pick it up
Reply
:iconshiiva-katase:
Shiiva-Katase Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2009
I see. I think... :hmm:
Reply
:iconmessenger-of-chaos:
Messenger-Of-Chaos Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2008  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Favourited.

The F-14's were retired in 2006, though.
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2008  Professional Interface Designer
thets not an f-14 thets a f-24 desing as replacement
Reply
:iconmessenger-of-chaos:
Messenger-Of-Chaos Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2008  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Oh I'm sorry, my mistake. I didn't know.
Reply
:iconfrazamm:
frazamm Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2008
Okay! how many aircraft would it carry, and I'd really like the ships that would sail with it. Brilliant!
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2008  Professional Interface Designer
about 100
Reply
:iconacelanceloet:
acelanceloet Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
it can't carry 100. an nimitz class carrier can carry about 80 aircraft, and that one is larger than this one..... and it has an far larger hangar then this hull can have. I suggest you check you sources.
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2010  Professional Interface Designer
combat loud is 100
Reply
:iconacelanceloet:
acelanceloet Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
ok. the combat load might be 100.... but then, there are no hawkeyes, no heli's and no transports on board. only fighter/bombers. and that won't happen.

also, the cvx-3 has an hangar not even half the size of that of the nimitz. the entire ship is smaller too.... I doubt you could carry 50 planes on board.
Reply
:iconcutangus:
CUTANGUS Featured By Owner May 18, 2008  Professional Digital Artist
Very interesting proposal for a future nuclear aircraft carrier!
Reply
:icontylerscottfurman:
TylerScottFurman Featured By Owner May 15, 2008
You have talent man, God I wish I was good at technical drawings : /
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
May 15, 2008
Image Size
157 KB
Resolution
2169×1627
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
31,732 (2 today)
Favourites
159 (who?)
Comments
25
Downloads
3,141

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×