Shop More Submit  Join Login
×
  • Art Print
  • Canvas
  • Photo
  • Art Gifts
Download PNG 1258 × 1152




Details

Submitted on
May 16, 2008
Image Size
88.9 KB
Resolution
1258×1152
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
7,626 (11 today)
Favourites
60 (who?)
Comments
17
Downloads
502 (1 today)

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×
YF-23A Black Widow II by bagera3005 YF-23A Black Widow II by bagera3005
YF-23A Black Widow II

in 1981, the Air Force developed a requirement for an Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) as a new air superiority fighter. It would take advantage of the new technologies in fighter design on the horizon including composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight control systems, higher power propulsion systems, and stealth technology. Air Force leaders believed these new technologies would make aircraft like the F-15 and F-16 obsolete by the early 21st century. In 1985, the Air Force sent out technical requests for proposals to a number of aircraft manufacturing teams (Boeing/General Dynamics and Northrop/McDonnell Douglas).

The Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) project was conceived in the early years of Reagan administration. It was pictured as being the aircraft which would replace the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle in USAF service. The competitor were Lockheed with it's YF-22 and Northrop/McDonnel Douglas with it's YF-23.

The body of the YF-23A is a blend of stealthy shapes and aerodynamic efficiency, hopefully providing a low radar cross section without compromising performance. The YF-23A was longer and more slender than the Lockheed YF-22A. The main load-bearing fuselage structure, measured from the stablizer to the front of the cockpit, is about 7 feet longer than the YF-22A. From the side, the profile of the YF-23A is reminiscent of that of the Lockheed SR-71. The general impression from other angles is that of a long, high forebody mounted between two widely-separated engine nacelles. The lengthwise variation in cross-sectional area is very smooth, minimizing transonic and supersonic drag. The forward section has a modified double-trapezoid cross section, one above the other in mirror image, with the aft region blending into a circular cross section and disappearing into the rear fuselage. The upper component of the engine box is dominated by two parallel engine nacelles that blend smoothly into the wing, each nacelle being of a modified trapezoidal cross section. The forebody has the cockpit, the nose landing gear, the electronics, and the missile bay. The YF-23 engine nacelles were larger than they would have been on the production F-23, since they had been designed to accommodate the thrust reversers originally planned for the ATF but later deleted.

Trapezoid-shaped air inlets are located underneath each wing, with the leading edge forming the forward lip of a simple fixed-geometry two-shock system. The placement of the intakes underneath the wings has the advantage in removing them from the sides of the fuselage so that a large boundary-layer scoop is not needed. Instead, the thin boundary layer which forms on the wing ahead of the inlet is removed through a porous panel and is vented above the wing. An auxiliary blow-in inlet door is located on each of the upper nacelles just ahead of the engine to provide additional air to the engines for takeoff or for low speeds. The inlet ducts leading to the engines curve in two dimensions, upward and inward, to shield the faces of the compressors from radar emitters coming from the forward direction.

The leading edge of the YF-23A's wing is swept back at 40 degrees, and the trailing edge is swept forward at the same angle. When viewed from above, the wing has the planform of a clipped triangle. On the YF-23A, every line in the planform is parallel to one or the other of the wing leading edges, which has become one of the guiding principles in stealthy design. The wing is structurally deep, and there is ample room for fuel inside the wing box.

The wing has leading-edge slats which extend over about two-thirds of the span. The trailing edge has a set of flaps inboard and a set of drooping ailerons outboard. In contrast to the Lockheed YF-22A, no speedbrake is fitted to the YF-23A.

The all-flying twin V-tails are set far apart on the rear fuselage. They are canted 50 degrees outwards in an attempt to avoid acute corners or right angles in elevation or front view. These all-flying tail sections are hinged at a single pivot. Their leading and trailing edges are parallel to the main wings but in a different plane. The all-flying canted tails double as shields for the engine exhaust in all angles except those immediately above or hehind the aircraft.

In the YF-23A, Northrop elected not to use thrust-vectoring for aerodynamic control. This was done in order to save weight and to help achieve better all-aspect stealth, especially from the rear. All controls are by aerodynamic surfaces. The V-tails work in pitch, roll, and yaw. The wing trailing edge controls provide roll control and lift augmentation, but they also function as speedbrakes and rudders. For straight line deceleration, the control system commands the outer ailerons to deflect up and the inboard flaps to deflect down, thus producing a decelerating force but creating no other moments. Yaw control can be provided by doing this on one side only.

There is a midair refuelling receptacle located on the upper fuselage behind the pilot's cockpit. Like the YF-22A, the YF-23A has a fly-by-wire system that controls the settings of the aerodynamic surfaces in response to inputs from the pilot.

The edge treatment is sustained on the fuselage afterbody, where a jagged-edged boat-tail deck fills in the gap between the two V-tails and blends the engine exhausts into the low-RCS planform. Unlike the YF-22A, the YF-23A does not use thrust vectoring. The exhaust nozzles are located well forward on the upper fuselage, between the tails, and are of the single expansion ramp type. There is one variable external flap on top of each nozzle, and the lower half of each nozzle is faired into a curved, fixed ramp. The engines exhaust into tunnels or trenches cut into the rear fuselage decking. These trenches are lined with head-resistant material, cooling the engine exhaust rapidly and making for a weaker IR source.

In the pursuit of stealth, all of the weapons carried by the F-23 were to have been housed completely internally. The forward section of the fuselage underbelly was flat, with a capacious weapons bay immediately aft of the nose gear bay. The bay could carry four AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles. The missiles were to be launched by having the doors open and the missiles extend out into the airstream on trapezes. The missiles would then drop free and the motor would fire. The doors would then immediately shut, minimizing the amount of time that they were open and thus possibly causing more intense radar returns. It was planned that production F-23 would have had a stretched forebody, accommodating an extra missile bay for a pair of AIM-9 Sidewinders or ASRAAM air-to-air missiles in front of the AMRAAM bay. In addition, production F-23s would have carried a 20-mm M61 Vulcan cannon fitted inside the upper starboard fuselage just above the main weapons bay.

Like the YF-22 team, the Northrop team built two YF-23 prototypes, one with General Electric YF-120
engines and the other with Pratt & Whitney YF-119 engines. First take off of "Gray Ghost" 27th Aug 1990 on Edward AFB, 26th Oct 1990 second prototype. First programm durated 65 hours divided into 50 flights, ended by second prototype 18th Dec 1990. After extensive flight testing 23th Apr 1991 the YF-22 was
selected for production.

TYPE : YF-23
Number built/Converted : 2 (PAV-1 (87-800), PAV-2 (87-801))
Remarks : ATF; lost to YF-22

SPECIFICATIONS
Span: 43 ft. 7 in. (13,2 m)
Length: 67 ft. 5 in. (20,3 m)
Height: 13 ft. 11 in. (4,2 m)
Wing area: 87,7 m2
Weight: 54,000 lbs. (23,500 kg) takeoff (YF-23/ATF design spec).
Empty weight: 38,580 lbs (16,783 kg).
Internal fuel: 2190 lbs (952 kg)
Engines: Two Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100's (87-800) of approximately 35,000 lbs. thrust each with afterburner and two General Electric F120-GE-100 (87-801) turbofans. Engine competition won by Pratt & Whitney.
Crew: One
Maximum speed: approximately Mach 2.0
Speed without afterburner Mach 1.6
Service Ceiling: approximately 65,000 ft. (ATF design spec)
Range: 1200 km
Armament: (planned)
Internal gun 20 mm M61
Internal bay - 8x AIM-9 Sidewinder or 4x AIM-120 AMRAAM; A-G missiles "Have Dash 2", A-G missiles "Have Slick"
Add a Comment:
 
:icondemondogmarine1960:
DemonDogMarine1960 Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2014
What Airforce1985 said, I was also pissed that the F-22 was chosen instead of this.  The YF-23 is better looking and more aerodynamic than the F-22.  Really pissed they didn't choose this.  I would have bought one for my personal use. 
Reply
:iconmaxhd2490:
MaxHD2490 Featured By Owner Feb 12, 2011
I wonder why YF-23 lose to the YF-22/F-22? you got any idea why bafera3005?
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Feb 12, 2011  Professional Interface Designer
back room dealing
Reply
:iconmaxhd2490:
MaxHD2490 Featured By Owner Feb 12, 2011
what does back room dealing mean by chance?
Reply
:iconairforce1985:
Airforce1985 Featured By Owner Sep 26, 2010
Really pissed that this didn't make it INSTEAD of the F-22. Better looking and more areodynamically beautiful!
Reply
:iconalexanderhyuuga:
Alexanderhyuuga Featured By Owner May 1, 2010
hey i have something to say to you. i sue your pic of war machine to make my bio serum prototype suit... i hope you dont get angry if you wish give a chck
Reply
:icontounushi:
Tounushi Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2009
Mind if I use this for a camo project?
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2009  Professional Interface Designer
GO ahead but there is full on posted to
Reply
:icontounushi:
Tounushi Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2009
No need for a larger one. Done already.
Reply
:iconcommissarfox:
CommissarFox Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2009
Can I use this picture for something? I need it and probably quite a few others..... Would it be okay if I gave you complete credit for the work?
Reply
Add a Comment: